your Windows® embedded community
Via's six newly-announced Nano 3000 processors are available in an L-series ("low-power") for mainstream desktop and mobile PC systems, and in a U-series ("ultra-low-power") for mini-notebooks and small form factor devices. They use the same 21mm x 21mm nanoBGA2 package as the original Nano, and once again are being manufactured -- likely by Fujitsu -- using a 65nm process.According to Via, the Nano 3000 devices are pin-compatible with earlier Nanos (see later in this story for background) and the earlier C7 and Eden CPUs, and still feature only single cores. However, in addition to a clock speed bump to 2.0GHz at the high end, the revised Nanos are said to add support for Intel's SSE4 instruction set extensions, plus Via's VT virtualization technology. (Previous Nanos supported only SSE3, just like Intel's own Atom.)
As a result, says Via, the Nano 3000 series can deliver up to 20 percent greater performance than previous Nanos, while using up to 20 percent less power. The chipmaker released the graphics below, suggesting that when clocked at 1.6GHz, the Nano 3000 outperforms Intel's Atom N270 by up to 45 percent on the PCMark 05 v120 benchmark, and 51 percent on the 3DMark2006 benchmark. (Of course, Nano CPUs are designed to use Via's integrated northbridge/southbridge chips such as the VX855, known to outpace the integrated graphics provided by Intel's 945GSE chipset.)


Ironically, however, Via didn't announce a Nano 3000 part designed to run exactly at 1.6GHz. Instead, as the table below shows, the new CPUs (highlighted in red) range from the 1.0GHz U3500 to the 2.0GHz L3100. All feature 1MB second-level caches and 800MHz frontside bus frequencies, as did the earlier Nanos.
| Name | Speed | Idle power | Maximum power (TDP max) |
| L3100 | 2.0GHz | 500mW | n/s |
| L3050 | 1.8GHz | 500mW | n/s |
| U3200 | 1.4GHz | 100mW | n/s |
| U3100 | 1.3+GHz | 100mW | n/s |
| U3300 | 1.2GHz | 100mW | n/s |
| U3500 | 1.0GHz | 100mW | n/s |
| L2100 | 1.8GHz | 500mW | 25.5W |
| L2200 | 1.6GHz | 100mW | 17W |
| U2400 | 1.3GHz | 100mW | 8W |
| U2500 | 1.2GHz | 100mW | 6.8W |
| U2300 | 1.0GHz | 100mW | 5W |
While claiming both "flawless playback of high bit-rate 1080p HD video" and lower power consumption for the new Nano 3000 chips, Via didn't back up the latter by making TDPs public. Idle power consumption, meanwhile, appears to be on par with previous Nanos, as our table shows.
A continuing point of pride for Via is its PadLock security engine, once again featured on the Nano 3000 CPUs. Offered at least since the 2003 introduction of the Eden-N, PadLock offers hardware-based Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) functionality, and imposes significantly less overhead than software-based encryption, according to the company.
Background
Via's Esther (used in the C7 and Eden) and Isaiah (used in the Nano) microarchitectures were designed by the company's CenTaur chip unit, headed up by Glenn Henry, a former IBM engineering fellow. Whereas Esther -- like Intel's Atom -- uses in-order execution, for the lowest power and size requirements, Isaiah uses out-of-order execution, similar to Intel's Core Duo architecture. Isaiah added compatibility with the 64-bit architectures already used by Intel and AMD, plus SSE3 media processing instructions. Another touted Isaiah feature was a reworked floating point unit.

